• Login
    Advanced Search
    • | About us
    • | eJournals
    • | Feedback
    • | Help Guide
    View Item 
    •   KIPPRA PPR Home
    • 3. KIPPRA Research Publications
    • Discussion Papers
    • View Item
    •   KIPPRA PPR Home
    • 3. KIPPRA Research Publications
    • Discussion Papers
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Discussion Paper No. 152 of 2013 on Determinants of Informal Finance Use in Kenya

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Full text (1.422Mb)
    Publication Date
    2013
    Author
    Bett, Julius
    Type
    KIPPRA Publications
    Item Usage Stats
    56
    views
    42
    downloads
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract/Overview

    The financial services sector plays a pivotal role in Kenya’s development by providing better intermediation between savings and investments and mobilization of capital required to implement Vision 2030 projects. However, Kenya’s financial system is dualistic in nature, with a dominant informal finance over formal finance. Informal finance entails financial activities that occur outside the immediate control of government agencies. This study examines the role played by an individual’s attitude towards formal finance and internal business regulation, while controlling individual socio-economic characteristics in determining use of informal finance. It uses data from FinAccess 2009 National Survey. To examine the hypothesized factors, the study used Maximum Likelihood technique to estimate a logit model. The study reveals that negative attitude towards formal finance and internal business regulations play a key role in promoting use of informal finance. Formal institutions in conjunction with the Central Bank of Kenya (CBK) should address the negative attitude by adopting an effective regulatory framework, policies and reforms that would lead to effective transformation of informal to formal finance. These regulations should filter favourably into informal systems, allowing transformation of informal institutions into formal. In addition, formal institutions should address customer needs on a case by case basis, rather than have standardized contracts that may not suit all individuals, hence enhance their flexibility. They should also rein on the escalating fees and other transaction costs that enhance a negative attitude. Similarly, the CBK in conjunction with the Kenya Bankers Association (KBA) and banking institutions should re-evaluate the know your customer (KYC) requirements with a view to weeding out excessive internal regulations that drive away individuals to using informal finance, without compromising on due diligence. Future studies should focus on linkages between formal and informal finance to determine whether they are complementary or substitutes. Further, data collection should be enhanced in order to support evidence-based policy formulation.

    Subject/Keywords
    Financial Service; Informal Finance; Financial Systems; Microfinance institutions
    Publisher
    The Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis (KIPPRA)
    Series
    Discussion Paper No.;152 of 2013
    Permalink
    http://repository.kippra.or.ke/handle/123456789/2519
    Collections
    • Discussion Papers [268]


    Contact Us | Send Feedback
     
    Related Links
    The National Treasury & PlanningKenya National Bureau of StatisticsMaarifa Centre - An Initiative of the Council of Governors (CoG)Kenya Revenue AuthorityParliament of KenyaAfrican Economic Research ConsortiumBrookings Institution

    Browse

    All of KIPPRA PPRCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage StatisticsView Google Analytics Statistics

    Contact Us | Send Feedback