• Login
    Advanced Search
    • | About us
    • | eJournals
    • | Feedback
    • | Help Guide
    View Item 
    •   KIPPRA PPR Home
    • 3. KIPPRA Research Publications
    • Discussion Papers
    • View Item
    •   KIPPRA PPR Home
    • 3. KIPPRA Research Publications
    • Discussion Papers
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Discussion Paper No. 167 of 2014 on Stimulating Supply of Residential Housing for Low Income Earners in Kenya

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Full Text (1.120Mb)
    Publication Date
    2014
    Author
    Vuluku, Gayline
    Type
    KIPPRA Publications
    Item Usage Stats
    63
    views
    55
    downloads
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    By
    Vuluku, Gayline
    Abstract/Overview

    The need to have shelter is indispensable to humanity and is classified among the top three basic needs. However, increase in population, scarcity of fixed assets such as land, escalating house prices, and the rising cost of living have made living inadequate and decent housing an illusion for many Kenyans. We use time series data, 1980-2011, drawn from the Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS) to determine the factors that would stimulate the residential housing market for low income earners. The Instrumental Variable estimation technique is applied for this study. The study found that Mombasa had a minimum house price of Ksh 2.24 million. This is already above the low cost amount provided by the Housing Bill 2011 for low income earners. Nairobi, on the other hand, had a minimum cost of supply of Ksh 2.12 million. The regression results are unique for the two towns. Whereas Nairobi had the lending rate, the cost of supply, the plinth area, labour and input cost index, inflation and the real interest rate being important in determining supply, Mombasa reported the coefficient, cost of building a house, commercial bank rate and their lagged values as important factors in determining supply. Additionally, treasury bill rate and plinth area were important in explaining supply of residential housing. In conclusion, the study recommends that while the government plays the role of an enabler, private developers should take advantage of the tax incentives to the low income segment. At the same time, they should consider offsetting profit margins with volumes of sales resulting from affordable housing. In addition, the National Housing Corporation (NHC) should devote itself to deliver low cost housing to the low income segment whose needs cannot be met by the private sector.

    Subject/Keywords
    Housing Market; Residential Housing; Employment Creation; Housing Systems; Poverty Reduction
    Publisher
    The Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis (KIPPRA)
    Series
    Discussion Paper;No. 167 of 2014
    Permalink
    http://repository.kippra.or.ke/handle/123456789/2531
    Collections
    • Discussion Papers [268]


    Contact Us | Send Feedback
     
    Related Links
    The National Treasury & PlanningKenya National Bureau of StatisticsMaarifa Centre - An Initiative of the Council of Governors (CoG)Kenya Revenue AuthorityParliament of KenyaAfrican Economic Research ConsortiumBrookings Institution

    Browse

    All of KIPPRA PPRCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage StatisticsView Google Analytics Statistics

    Contact Us | Send Feedback