• Login
    Advanced Search
    • | About us
    • | eJournals
    • | Feedback
    • | Help Guide
    View Item 
    •   KIPPRA PPR Home
    • 3. KIPPRA Research Publications
    • Discussion Papers
    • View Item
    •   KIPPRA PPR Home
    • 3. KIPPRA Research Publications
    • Discussion Papers
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Discussion Paper No. 21 of 2002 on Tobacco Excise Tax in Kenya: an Appraisal

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Full text (215.2Kb)
    Publication Date
    2002
    Author
    Kiringai, Jane
    Ndung'u, Njuguna S.
    Karingi, Stephen N.
    Type
    Discussion Paper
    Item Usage Stats
    120
    views
    119
    downloads
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract/Overview

    Excise taxes form a substantial proportion of revenue for governments all over the world, and especially in low-income developing countries. Excise taxes are levied on a few goods characterised by low price elasticity of demand; there is minimal cutback in consumption of the good as price increases. Excise on tobacco falls under the category of sin taxes—taxes that are meant to discourage behaviour associated with inefficient decision-making. Using OLS, we determine both the long-run and short-run price elasticity for cigarettes which we then use to determine the tax rate that would maximise tax revenue for the government. The empirical results show that long-run responses are high, ranging between -1.78 for all cigarettes to -1.36 for filter cigarettes. Using the elasticity for all cigarettes, we find that the tax rate that would maximise tax revenue should be at 128%. This is fairly close to the current rate of 130% but the revenue maximising tax rate combines both excise tax and VAT. We conclude that in general, the price elasticity is not as low as authorities may have assumed. In the short run, the elasticity is low yet tax policy cannot be based on short-run responses but rather on long-run structural movements. Since tobacco excise tax is a sin tax, there is justification to impose high taxes, despite the high elasticity, to deter consumption. However, if set too high there will be evasion and smuggling, therefore defeating the revenue maximising goal. There is also a danger of substitution to more harmful substances.

    Subject/Keywords
    Excise tax; Tobacco; Tobacco products; Kenya; Revenue
    Publisher
    The Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis (KIPPRA)
    Series
    Discussion Paper No. 21 of 2002;
    Permalink
    http://repository.kippra.or.ke/handle/123456789/2582
    Collections
    • Discussion Papers [268]


    Contact Us | Send Feedback
     
    Related Links
    The National Treasury & PlanningKenya National Bureau of StatisticsMaarifa Centre - An Initiative of the Council of Governors (CoG)Kenya Revenue AuthorityParliament of KenyaAfrican Economic Research ConsortiumBrookings Institution

    Browse

    All of KIPPRA PPRCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage StatisticsView Google Analytics Statistics

    Contact Us | Send Feedback