• Login
    Advanced Search
    • | About us
    • | eJournals
    • | Feedback
    • | Help Guide
    View Item 
    •   KIPPRA PPR Home
    • 3. KIPPRA Research Publications
    • Discussion Papers
    • View Item
    •   KIPPRA PPR Home
    • 3. KIPPRA Research Publications
    • Discussion Papers
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Discussion Paper No. 66 of 2007 on Special Products Under WTO Negotiations: The Case for Kenya

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Full Text (217.3Kb)
    Publication Date
    2007
    Author
    Waiyaki, Nicholas
    MIencha, Fred
    Nyangito, Hezron
    Type
    Discussion Paper
    Item Usage Stats
    37
    views
    80
    downloads
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract/Overview

    There is need to identify agricultural products that may be designated as Special Products (SPs) for the purpose of receiving Special and Differential Treatment (SDT) under World Trade Organization (WTO) provisions. Special Products for Kenya have been selected using indicators contained in the draft possible modalities on agriculture, circulated by the Chairman of the WTO Committee on Agriculture in June 2006. The indicators relate to contribution of a particular product to a country’s food and livelihood security, and rural development. Overall, 11 products were found to qualify for designation as Special Products. These are: maize, sugar, wheat, milk and milk products, rice, meat and meat products, oil crops, cotton, horticultural products (vegetables and fruits), irish potatoes and millet. About 145 tariff lines accounting for about 20 percent of total agricultural tariff lines relating to these products were found to qualify for designation as Special Products. This is within the limits so far proposed under WTO negotiations. The paper recommends that Kenya be allowed to self-designate the identified Special Products and that developing countries be allowed some flexibility to substitute the selected Special Products whenever national priorities change. It further recommends that Kenya negotiates for exemption of all identified Special Products from tariff reduction. In the event that exemption of all identified Special Products is found not to be acceptable to other WTO members, then the country may seek exemption for only a few products, particularly those that have relatively low tariffs and are very important for food security, for protecting the livelihoods of the poor, and for rural development needs.

    Subject/Keywords
    Land Resources; Food Crops; Agricultural Imports; Food Security; Livelihood Security
    Publisher
    The Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis (KIPPRA)
    Series
    Discussion Paper;No. 66 of 2007
    Permalink
    http://repository.kippra.or.ke/handle/123456789/2630
    Collections
    • Discussion Papers [268]


    Contact Us | Send Feedback
     
    Related Links
    The National Treasury & PlanningKenya National Bureau of StatisticsMaarifa Centre - An Initiative of the Council of Governors (CoG)Kenya Revenue AuthorityParliament of KenyaAfrican Economic Research ConsortiumBrookings Institution

    Browse

    All of KIPPRA PPRCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage StatisticsView Google Analytics Statistics

    Contact Us | Send Feedback