• Login
    Advanced Search
    • | About us
    • | eJournals
    • | Feedback
    • | Help Guide
    View Item 
    •   KIPPRA PPR Home
    • 3. KIPPRA Research Publications
    • Discussion Papers
    • View Item
    •   KIPPRA PPR Home
    • 3. KIPPRA Research Publications
    • Discussion Papers
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Discussion Paper No 249 of 2020 on Enhancing Spatial Equity in Location Planning for Affordable Housing: The Case of Nairobi City County

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Full Text (2.281Mb)
    Publication Date
    2020
    Author
    Gachanja, James
    Type
    KIPPRA Publications
    Item Usage Stats
    121
    views
    151
    downloads
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    By
    Gachanja, James
    Abstract/Overview

    The affordable housing programme is being implemented by the Government of Kenya to address housing adequacy challenges in the country. Access to affordable and decent housing is imperative to improving the quality of life of Kenyans and ensuring human dignity. The choice of location for the construction of housing can either enhance or reduce equity in access to housing and services. The study sought to analyse spatial equality in housing and infrastructure provision using the City of Nairobi as a case example. Key concepts of spatial welfare, spatial equity, spatial justice and sustainable development framed the study. Using spatial analysis methods, the study first identified suitable locations (sites) for providing affordable housing. The identified sites were then evaluated for prioritization and decision-making using the spatial multi-criteria evaluation method. Criteria for analysis were identified from the literature and prioritized using a participatory approach; that is, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The study finds that prioritization of criteria and the consequent determination of weights or relative importance differs based on the background of stakeholders. For instance, what local citizens define as a priority may not be given the same weight by professionals or Government project officials. This highlights the nature of the ‘decision problem’ in planning and providing affordable housing units. There is observed spatial inequality concerning access or coverage of physical and social infrastructure. Locations have been identified that are less equity enhancing and would further adversely affect the lives and well-being of targeted beneficiaries, barring any affirmative infrastructure interventions. The findings are instrumental in planning and budgeting and prioritization in the allocation of resources for housing and infrastructure development.

    Subject/Keywords
    Affordable Housing; Sustainable Development; Spatial Equity; Location Planning; National Housing Programmes
    Publisher
    Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis
    Permalink
    http://repository.kippra.or.ke/handle/123456789/3273
    Collections
    • Discussion Papers [268]


    Contact Us | Send Feedback
     
    Related Links
    The National Treasury & PlanningKenya National Bureau of StatisticsMaarifa Centre - An Initiative of the Council of Governors (CoG)Kenya Revenue AuthorityParliament of KenyaAfrican Economic Research ConsortiumBrookings Institution

    Browse

    All of KIPPRA PPRCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage StatisticsView Google Analytics Statistics

    Contact Us | Send Feedback