dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-02T09:50:13Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-07-02T09:50:13Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.kippra.or.ke/handle/123456789/3025 | |
dc.description.abstract | Although each arm of government is independent of
the other, the three are designed such that their functions
complement and check on the excesses of the other. Good
governance is compromised when either arm of government
performs its functions in a way that encroaches on the
mandate of the other. When the other arm asserts its position
and challenges the encroaches this spurs supremacy wars and
undermines institutional inter-dependence, which is critical for
good governance. The promulgation of the new Constitution in Kenya
in 2010 heralded an era of strengthened institutions of
governance. Chapter 8 of the Constitution creates a bi-cameral
Parliament comprising the National Assembly and the Senate,
each with a clear mandate. Equally, Chapter 10 provides the
criteria for establishment and the functions of the Judiciary. Recent disagreements between the two houses
of parliament portray a supremacy war that is likely to
compromise the inter-dependence of the Legislative arm
of government, which in turn will affect good governance. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | The Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis (KIPPRA) | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Policy Monitor Issue 7, No.2 2015; | |
dc.subject | Good governance | en |
dc.subject | Supremacy wars | en |
dc.title | Policy Monitor, Issue 7 No. 2 January-June 2015 on Supremacy Wars Between State Agencies in Kenya Could Compromise Good Governance | en |
dc.type | KIPPRA Publications | en |
ppr.contributor.author | The Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis (KIPPRA) | en |