Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned2020-11-25T06:31:04Z
dc.date.available2020-11-25T06:31:04Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.kippra.or.ke/handle/123456789/2244
dc.description.abstractSeveral studies make different prior assumptions on the magnitude of factor shares and scale of production when accounting for economic growth. The initial Solow estimations, for instance, assumed a capital share of 0.3 and constant returns to scale. Most authors have subsequently used the same restrictions just because they were used in previous studies, even when production in the countries under study may not necessarily be taking place under constant returns to scale, and capital share may be a value not any close to 0.3. This is likely to distort growth accounting estimation results. This study investigates whether these prior restrictions on factor shares and scale of production as commonly used in the literature are appropriate. The paper also examines whether there is any change in the explanatory power of the model when the Solow Model is augmented with human capital accumulation.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherThe Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis (KIPPRA)en
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDP/107/2010;
dc.subjectEconomic Growthen
dc.subjectRestrictionsen
dc.subjectAccounting Estimationsen
dc.subjectFactor Sharesen
dc.titleDiscussion Paper No. 107 of 2010 on Are Prior Restrictions on Factor Shares Appropriate in Economic Growth Accounting Estimations?en
dc.typeDiscussion Paperen
ppr.contributor.authorOduor, Jacob


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record